RePrinted From Davis Stirling-HOA Maintenance Duties

While associations may delegate maintenance to owners, I don't recommend deck maintenance and replacement be an owners responsibility. Like roofs, they keep whats below dry, in my opinion, decks over living space are roofs first, then a deck.

MAINTENANCE DUTIES
QUESTIONIf a new set of CC&Rs transfers maintenance responsibility and repair costs from the 

association to the owners, would it be legal?

ANSWER: Yes, it would be legal. Maintenance duties do not automatically follow ownership and
 can be reassigned by the membership via the governing documents. 

Condominiums. In condominiums, members own air space plus an undivided percentage interest

in the common areas. Even though all plumbing and wiring in the walls are owned in common, 
maintenance of these exclusive usecommon areas is typically assigned to unit owners. Civil Code §1364(a).

Planned Unit Developments. In PUDs with townhouse construction, members own their individual 

structures from the roof to the foundation and to the center of the party wall separating it from the next unit. Nonetheless, 
maintenance of the roof and exterior walls is typically assigned to the association even though it has no ownership interest
 in the structure. Assigning maintenance to the HOA should ensure timely and proper roof repairs (via reserve funds) and
 uniform paint colors on exterior walls.

Benefits the Whole. The California Supreme Court determined that “anyone who buys a unit in a common interest 

development with knowledge of its owners association's discretionary power accepts the risk that the power may be
 used in a way that benefits the commonality but harms the individual.” The Court concluded that “the reasonableness . . . 
of a condominium use restriction . . . is to be determined not by reference to facts that are specific to the objecting
 homeowner, but by reference to the common interest development as a whole.” Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village.

RECOMMENDATION: HOAs can and should amend their documents to assign or reassign maintenance duties in a manner 

that makes sense for their particular development. Since most CC&Rs are vague when it comes to maintenance, clearly 
defining those duties is one of the main benefits of a restatement of an association's governing documents. Doing so 
eliminates ambiguities that frequently lead to costly litigation.


Copyright
ADAMS KESSLER

Reprinted from 
Davis-Stirling.com byAdams Kessler PLC

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.